A negotiated peace did seem possible once, almost 30 years ago. Resolution 242 was formally accepted by israel in may 1968 but was rejected by palestinian leaders for 21 years, and they did not fully accept it until 1993. Aware of arabs past aggression, resolution 181, in paragraph c, calls on the security council to. Nor did those involved in the negotiations and drafting of the resolution. The security council in resolution 242 formulated the principles of a just and lasting peace, including an israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in the conflict, a just settlement of the. Jul 30, 2006 a series of targetted assassinations by israel against hamas and hezbollah, and resulting violent retaliations escalated in mid2006 with the capture of israeli soldiers. In the wake of the june 1967 six day war, united nations security council adopts resolution 242. Israel views moves by palestinian leaders to obtain international recognition of a state of palestine as being unilateral action by the palestinians and inconsistent with a negotiated twostate solution. That led to an escalation of conflict, with air strikes by israel against lebanon and hezbollah, destroying much of the main infrastructure. Resolution 242 these resolutions are qualitatively different from the wellknown resolution 242, the socalled land for peace resolution, which requires action by other states and by nonstate actors, as well as israel. No internationally recognized, secure border has ever defined the area of the west bank and gaza strip and nowhere does 242 require that palestinians be given any political rights or.
Security council adopted resolution 242, which called on israel to relinquish some unspecified part of the territory it had conquered, providing the arabs signed on to allow israel to live in peace, free from the threat of armed aggression. Throughout 1972, and for much of 1973, sadat threatened war unless the united states forced israel to accept his interpretation of resolution 242 which the united nations passed following the 1967 six day wartotal israeli withdrawal from territories taken in 1967. Washington claimed the role of the honest broker while proudly asserting its continuity as israel s major financial, diplomatic and military backer. Israel did not accept this as a valid reason for lack of documents. Shortly after the 1967 war, israel illegally annexed east jerusalem and declared it part of its eternal, undivided capital. Israel will never negotiate from or return to the lines of partition or to the 1967 borders. Even as the council is poised to revisit the legacy of resolution 242. These led to peace treaties between israel and egypt 1979 and jordan 1994, as well as the 1993 and 1995 agreements with the palestinians. But it must be prepared to withdraw as resolution 242 says from territories occupied in the recent conflict. Resolution 242 is one of the most widely affirmed resolutions on the arabisraeli conflict and formed the basis for later negotiations between the parties. Johnson said, now, finally, let me turn to the middle eastand to the tumultuous events of the past months. Nor did those involved in the negotiations and drafting of the resolution want such a requirement. The territorial issue needs to be addressed realistically.
Jul 24, 2016 i think it would be best for you to examine your question before stating that israel did or did not do something. But lord caradon of england, and eugene rostow of the u. While the camp david accords were negotiated over a few days in the summer of 1978, they were actually the result of months of. Resolution 242 was approved on november 22, 1967, more than five months after the war. In the pre1967 borders israel was barely 10 miles wide at its narrowest point. The 19491967 lines are not even referred to in the resolution. Abba eban told george ball israel was willing to return most of the west bank to jordan. Dec 11, 2018 the us joint chiefs of staff recommended that for israel s security necessities, that it hold on to at least 40% of the territory between the jordan river and the green line. The israeli government appears to maintain that the resolution does not. Israel contends that resolution 242 requires each of its neighbors to recognize israels right to exist and to negotiate bilaterally a secure border. Israel and the real failing of resolution 242 world. Arabisrael conflict amongst these the peace treaties between israel and.
Israel would agree to accept a certain number of palestinians and the rest would be settled in a palestinian state outside israel. Israel, however, did not accept the resolution and continues to violate it to this day, over 50 years later, by building settlements on the territories meant for a palestinian state. This principle was the reason why israel agreed to accept the resolution of november 22, 1967, for not only did it accord recognition. But if resolution 242 allows a partial withdrawal, then the proposed new resolutions would contradict and countermand the earlier resolution, to israel s substantial disadvantage. Parallel realities resolution 242 and the aftermath of.
Resolutions 242 and 338 call for israel s withdrawal from territories as part of a peace agreement. The palestinians have accepted other offers, such as the security council resolution 242 in 1967 and the oslo accords, which promised them a meager 22 percent of palestine at best. The central concept in the resolution was an israeli exchange of land won in the 1967 war the sinai peninsula, the golan heights, portions of. The arab countries and the local arab residents did not accept the decision of the league of nations although they did not deny the authority of the league from which they had received so much benefit. Resolution 181 constituted legal authority for israels creation, or otherwise constituted recognition by the u. Resolution 242 1967 does not explicitly require that israel withdraw to the lines.
The united states has long said it would not deal with the p. Withdrawal of israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict. Resolution 242, interpretation and implications cjpme english. This resolution was a tortuously negotiated compromise between competing proposals. The grammatical construction of the french version of resolution 242 says israel should withdraw from the territories, whereas the english version of the text calls for withdrawal from territories. Response from the affected parties not long after the united nations security council passed resolution 242, jordan and israel accepted the resolution. How a missing the enabled israeli occupation palestine. Security council adopts resolution 242, calling for israeli withdrawal from territories occupied during the six day war and respect for the rights of all states to live in peace and security. Not long after the united nations security council passed resolution 242, jordan and israel accepted the resolution. The real failing of resolution 242 was that it regarded the palestinian arabs as merely homeless refugees, not a stateless nation, and the underlying assumption was that the west bank or. It is important to stress that resolution 242 in no way called on israel to withdraw to the lines of june 4, 1967, before the outbreak of the sixday war. Prior to the vote on the british draft that became resolution 242, the representative of the soviet union said, we understand the decision taken to mean the withdrawal of israel forces from all, and we repeat, all territories belonging to arab states and seized by israel following its attack on those states on 5 june 1967. Parallel realities resolution 242 and the aftermath of 1967. So although arab officials claim resolution 242 requires israel to withdraw from.
By jews for justice in the middle east published in berkeley, ca, 2001. In an address to a conference of educators on june 19, 1967, five months before unsc resolution 242 was unanimously passed by the security council. Jarring mission special representative to middle east appointed under res. I think it would be best for you to examine your question before stating that israel did or did not do something.
For israel, resolution 242 was a tool to reach unilateral agreements with arab countries without making any concessions on its military occupation of east jerusalem, the west bank and the gaza strip. Resolution 242 was to become the cornerstone of middle east diplomatic efforts. The resolution was really the first attempt at land for peace. Jan 26, 2018 prior to the vote on the british draft that became resolution 242, the representative of the soviet union said, we understand the decision taken to mean the withdrawal of israel forces from all, and we repeat, all territories belonging to arab states and seized by israel following its attack on those states on 5 june 1967. Recommending partition of the british mandate for pa. Israels position was that in order to implement 242, the parties would have to meet facetoface and negotiate a peace treaty. In return, after years of rejection of israel as part of the middle east, the arabs will accept and recognize israel s right to exist as a sovereign state within secure and defined borders in this region as they did, for example, in the vetoed security council resolution of. The resolution calls for the withdrawal of israeli troops from the occupied territories.
United nations resolution 242 this resolution, which was adopted at the end of the sixday war, was an effort by the security council to resolve the border issues between the arab nations and israel. In 2002, the arab league proposed recognition of israel by arab countries as part of the resolution of the palestine israel conflict as part of the arab peace initiative. Washington claimed the role of the honest broker while proudly asserting its continuity as israels major financial, diplomatic and military backer. International law and israeli settlements wikipedia. The security council, expressing its continuing concern with the grave situation in the middle east, emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every state in the area can live in security. After denouncing it in 1967, syria conditionally accepted the resolution in march 1972. The us, while referring to resolution 242 as the ostensible basis of its own peace process, kept israelpalestine diplomacy under its own control. That procedure, followed with egypt in 197779, led to egypts recognition of israel and israels withdrawal from the sinai. Still, the plo rejected the offer, also embarrassing the saudis in the process. Sres242 1967 of 22 november 1967 question of palestine. Security council resolution 242 jerusalem center for public affairs. The resolution acknowledges the arabs rights to these lands, and israel s right to peace and security.
The boundary between the two states is still subject to dispute and negotiation, with palestinian and arab leadership insisting on the 1967 borders, which is not accepted by israel. The passports of some countries are not valid for travel to israel, including bangladesh, brunei, iran, iraq, and pakistan. During that war, israel invaded and occupied gaza and the sinai peninsula, territory held by or belonging to egypt. Resolution 242 in no way called on israel to withdraw to the lines of june 4, 1967, before the outbreak of the sixday war. The middle east conflicta brief background global issues.
The reagan administrations approach to middle east peacemaking. While resolution 242 called for israels armed forces to withdraw from territories occupied in the recent conflict, no resolution called for israel to hand over all of east jerusalem to a future palestinian state. Israel s position was that in order to implement 242, the parties would have to meet facetoface and negotiate a peace treaty. Camp david accords, agreements between israel and egypt signed on september 17, 1978, that led in 1979 to a peace treaty between the two countries, the first such treaty between israel and any of its arab neighbors. Israel announced that it accepted security council resolution 242 and was ready to negotiate with each arab state on each element in that resolution. United nations security council resolution 242 wikipedia. This would take time, obviously, but time seemed to be on israels side, and the israelis had officially made it clear that they did not intend to return to the former.
By the late 1980s, israel, most arab states, the plo, the united states, the soviet union and most of the nations of the world had accepted resolution 242 as the proper basis for a settlement of. Palestinians speak out on anniversary of resolution 242. Determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of. In most cases, documents were lost or destroyed during the 1948 war.
Resolution 242 was passed on 22 november 1967, a few months after israel had acquired large. Yet the accepted procedure to be followed in cases of clashing texts. The twostate solution to the israelipalestinian conflict envisages an independent state of palestine alongside the state of israel, west of the jordan river. Israeli prime minister menachem begin and egyptian president anwar sadat won the 1978 nobel peace prize. Opinion israels 1967 victory is something to celebrate. Security council resolution 242, which created a framework allowing for palestinian. The us, while referring to resolution 242 as the ostensible basis of its own peace process, kept israel palestine diplomacy under its own control. History of the question of palestine question of palestine. United nations resolution 242 council on foreign relations. The resolution became the context and framework for subsequent official arabisraeli negotiations. The real failing of resolution 242 was that it regarded the palestinian arabs as merely homeless refugees, not a stateless nation, and the. Therefore, according to resolution 242, israel was assigned rights and.
Security council resolution 242 1967 of 22 november 1967 also known as. The socalled peace process has always been nothing more than a fiction, which has always led to israel stealing more palestinian land. The military government also controlled the palestinian population remaining in israel by policies of separation and isolation, policies not applied to the jewish population. United nations security council resolution 242 sres242 was adopted unanimously by the. Gone was the need to recognize israel s right to exist or even to accept 242 and 338 as is. United nations adopts resolution 242 center for israel.
485 733 1504 1164 1147 1348 1219 370 1442 1318 1094 1106 572 182 167 1360 1140 1187 1023 870 608 771 868 1217 197 449 22 997 1468 1247 350 438 931 196 1283 940 1516 1374 387 1310 535 150 162 1391 1134 973 276 109